Advanced Search Home

Operation Noble Eagle - Anthrax Incident

BackgroundRelated LinksIn The NewsDeploymentsHealth Outcomes & ConcernsClimate & GeographyPreventative Measures

Environmental Exposures

Anthrax 2001: Observations on the Medical and Public Health Response

This article describes aspects of the medical and public health response to the 2001 anthrax attacks based on interviews with individuals who were directly involved in the response. It has been more than 18 months since B. anthracis spores were discovered in letters sent through the U.S. postal system. The specific purpose and perpetrator(s) of these attacks remain unknown.

A total of 22 people developed anthrax as a result of the mailings, 11 suffered from the inhalational form of the disease, and 5 of these people died. Thousands of workers - including health care, public health, environmental, and law enforcement professionals - participated in the response to the attacks. Thousands more were directly affected, including individuals working in facilities contaminated by the attacks and their families. The immediate and continuing medical and public health response to the anthrax attacks of 2001 represents a singular episode in the history of public health.

After-action assessments of the response to the anthrax attacks could offer invaluable opportunities to better understand and remedy the systemic vulnerabilities revealed by America’s only experience with an anthrax attack. Yet there still has been no comprehensive published analysis of the response to these events. In December 2001, the Center for Strategic International Studies convened a meeting, which included high-level government officials directly involved in managing the crisis, to discuss the response and review lessons learned.

The report describing this meeting has been withheld from public distribution by the Department of Defense, which supported the meeting, on the grounds that the document contains sensitive information. The "response" to the anthrax attacks was extremely complex, and any analysis that purports to assess the response must account for this complexity. The unprecedented nature of the attacks and the context in which the response occurred are also crucial to understanding what happened and why.

The long-standing neglect of federal, state, and local public health agencies, and the highly stressed condition of U.S. medical facilities, which routinely work at the limits of their capacity, are acknowledged by virtually all informed observers. That the medical and public health institutions involved in the response functioned as well as they did is a tribute to the extraordinary efforts of the individuals involved. Despite the commitment and hard work of the individuals in these professional communities, what was revealed by the anthrax attacks was an unacceptable level of fragility in systems now properly recognized as vital to national defense.

For more information, please refer to:
Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science Volume 1, Number 2, 2003


For Mar 11, 2010

Notification of Abnormal Lab Test Results in an Electronic Medical Record: Do Any Safety Concerns Remain?

The onset of daylight saving time can be hazardous to your health

Lifting of war-zone alcohol ban discussed

Returning from Front Lines: The Stigma of Mental Illness

IRAQ: An Environmental Cesspool

Burn pits contained asbestos

Call for Presentations for Deployment Healthcare Track, Force Health Protection Conference Aug 2010

Subscribe to the DHCC Newsletter
External Links Disclamier



 Browser Information Security & Privacy Notice 


www.PDHealth.mil is the Official Web site of the DoD Deployment Health Clinical Center
Located at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C.